Nice synopsis of the inaction from Berlin and Paris this month.

While welcoming inclusion, why are these meetings posturing points with far too many people with far too many organisations; many speaking so they can say 'I told you so' and possibly not understanding the issues of vested interests managing to undermine any effective decision-making?

Yes, we are all aware of campaigning and lobbying but have we dug deeper to look at the socio-economics underpinning men, predominantly men, keeping themselves in control of the finances that really matter? Who actually makes decisions to generate action? How are key organisations causing these organisations and institutions to take longer term decisions and stop this race to the bottom / last man standing?

A bit more social anthropology to get past the buzzwords?

Some more business school and management psychological input?

Thoughts to prompt fresh actions